|
The Circumcision Decision
Circumcision is not a routine, painless procedure; it is an extremely
painful, completely unnecessary surgery. A newborn baby, usually
less than 48 hours old, is taken from the warm arms of his parents
and strapped down to a "Circumstraint". The process that
ensues is akin to ripping off a fingernail. The blood vessels in
the top of the foreskin are crushed by a hemostat and then the foreskin
is ripped away from the glans. A device is then used to amputate
the wounded foreskin. This procedure is commonly done without anesthesia,
though here in Omaha, anesthesia is now being used for circumcisions.
Anesthesia cannot completely prevent the pain, comes with all the
inherent risks of anesthesia, and certainly doesn't help with postoperative
pain.
The process of caring for an injured penis involves keeping a barrier,
such as vaseline and gauze between the open wound and the diaper.
The penis has to be cared for at each diaper change and it can be
quite difficult cleaning the wound after a bowel movement. Healing
takes several weeks. The possible complications from circumcision
are infection, scarring and a bowing of the penis if too much foreskin
is removed. In severely botched circumcisions, though this is admittedly
rare, the surgeon may accidentally injure or cut off the glans.
So why do we routinely perform such an unnecessary and painful
operation on our newborn baby boys? Well, in short, custom. Circumcision
for non-religious reasons began in the early puritanical days of
our country as a cure for masturbation. As with many cultural practices,
circumcision continues to be done because "that's just how
we do things around here". Many doctors and parents are starting
to question this custom and the rates of circumcision are starting
to drop. There is not a single medical body, including the American
Academy of Pediatrics, which recommends routine circumcision.
Aside from the pain, what's wrong with losing a useless piece of
skin? That's just it; circumcision is more than the removal of a
useless piece of skin. It is the removal of part of the male genitalia.
It contains millions of nerve endings, protects the glans, and provides
lubrication during intercourse. Anecdotally, many women have found
that a lover with an intact foreskin is preferable. Also, men who
have had circumcisions done later in life report that they experience
decreased sensation during intercourse after their circumcision.
Ask any circumcised American male if he has decreased sensation
during intercourse, and you'll probably hear a resounding, "I
feel everything just fine, thank you very much." But how would
a male circumcised at birth know the difference? Many with strong
feelings on this subject believe that circumcision is basically
sexual mutilation.
But aren't there medical reasons for circumcision? Isn't a circumcised
penis cleaner and infected less often? Nope. An intact penis is
not dirty and doesn't require any extra care. There is no need,
and is in fact harmful, to retract the foreskin before it retracts
on its own sometime between toddlerhood and pre-adolescence. A boy
will figure out how to keep himself clean the same way a girl will
know how to keep herself clean. Occasionally you will hear horror
stories of a boy who has to be circumcised later in life because
of an infection. This is very rare and the risks of a routine circumcision
outstrip any risks of infection later in life. We don't perform
surgeries to prevent a problem with a body part later on. If this
were the case, we would routinely perform mastectomies because the
breasts can become cancerous later on. Insert any other body part
into this analogy.
But a boy should look like his father and his brother. Oh yeah?
Do fathers and sons or two brothers ever look exactly alike? If
the question ever even comes up, parents can simply explain to their
son that they found out that circumcision was unnecessary and so
they chose not to have it done. As a general rule, parents do not
continue a practice if they find out that it is a mistake simply
for the sake of sameness. Parents should not dwell on mistakes made
during the past in a climate of no information or misinformation.
They should simply move on and make better decisions.
And what about the locker room? First of all, young boys don't
usually get naked in locker rooms any more. Secondly, the rates
of circumcision are falling dramatically so chances are your son
won't be the only one with an intact penis. The rate of circumcision
has fallen to below 60% in this country. The rates are lowest in
the Western states and still highest in the Midwest. Thirdly, we
don't make decisions, especially to have surgery, to avoid teasing.
Teasing will invariably happen to a child sometime in his life and
it is the parents' responsibility to teach a child how to deal with
teasing and it is the parents' responsibility to raise a child with
a healthy self-esteem that will not be decimated by the pressures
of conformity.
The circumcision decision does become more complicated when the
question of religion is introduced. Around the world, only about
15% of males are circumcised and most of these males are Jewish
or Muslim. Some in the Jewish community maintain that religious
circumcision originally was much different than today's circumcision
being that only a small portion of the foreskin was removed. Today
you will find both groups of Muslims
and Jews
who advocate against the practice of circumcision. As the author
of this article, I am neither Jewish nor Muslim, so I don't feel
qualified to make a judgment about religious circumcision, so I
would respectfully advise you to consult your religious leaders.
"OK", you say to me, "I'm convinced, but my spouse
isn't". "OK", you say to me, "but my husband
wants it done and since he has a penis, shouldn't he make the decision?"
Well, there are two avenues to take. You can simply put your foot
down, as is the responsibility of a parent if harm is about to be
done to a child. Or, you can gently educate your spouse and ask
them to read relevant literature before making the decision. Some
spouses have been known to qualify the decision, saying "I'll
leave it up to you honey, but you have to be present during the
circumcision". Arrange for them, if possible, to watch a circumcision
before you actually agree to do have it done to your own child.
Or, you can find a "pro penis" doctor to explain to your
spouse the reasons for allowing your boy to remain intact.
When it boils right down to it, the most convincing reason to avoid
circumcision is to spare your baby boy unnecessary pain. I deluged
my husband with literature (he just loves it when I do this) and
tried to argue how an intact penis would benefit him sexually down
the road. Truth was, he didn't care much for all the reading I gave
him and he figured our son's sex life would turn out fine either
way. He believed the threat of accidental penis amputation was simply
a scare tactic. He just decided there was no reason for his new
little baby boy to be in pain. Simple but profound.
Mommythink Feed
|